Uncategorized

uss iowa vs yamato

The particular piece of armor tested was the 26-inch frontal armor for one of the Shinano’s 18-inch turrets. The Nuclear shells were a much later cold war development. report. One researcher can offer an answer, or at least a very educated guess. Légendes navales : U.S.S. The USS Wisconsin was the fourth and final Iowa-class battleship completed. Most of the Shinano’s armor had already been built when the conversion was ordered and the U.S. Navy found some of it in storage after the war. While a showdown between the Iowa-class and Yamato-class would have been impressive, the true ultimate showdown would have been between the Montana-class battleships and the Yamato-class. Your email address will not be published. Playing next. Iowa enjoyed a career through World War II, Korea and was even reactivated during the 1980s. © Copyright 2021 Center for the National Interest All Rights Reserved. “Yamato was simply built to stand up to and utterly outclass any conceivable American or British opponent by sheer weight of gunfire and elephant-like armor,” Parshall writes. The Iowas were designed to be high-speed 32-knot battleships to act as the protection to the carrier fleet. Granted, that doesn’t guarantee hits, but longer range has always been an acknowledged advantage in gunnery. The U.S. Navy realized early in the war though that these ships were obsolete before they had even been laid down and cancelled them. In 1945 the era of the battlewagon was already ending, sinking beneath the weight of swarms of aircraft. The Rumor was the the second Montana class ship was to be the USS Ohio with a new 20 inch gun …. References to specific designs, models, manufacturers, and/or modifications of ships and aircraft are used only for the purpose of historical consistency and do not assume any funding or other involvement in the project on the part of the holders of trademarks. Post Aug 16, 2010 #2 2010-08-16T23:33. 18-Inch shells built for the Yamato-class battleships. But if Yamato gets lucky and gets in the first hit or two, and they’re doozies, it could very easily be game over for Iowa.”, (Recommended: The 5 Most Deadly Battleships). Yamato and Iowa wouldn’t have stood turret-to-turret in an arena like a pair of heavyweight boxers. Based strictly on raw numbers, I would give the edge to Iowa based on her superior fire control. But optics were susceptible to bad weather and smoke. I am no expert, but let me play devils advocate; larger caliber guns = larger shells = more powder = higher exit velocity = longer range. The larger context of the battle—the U.S. Navy being forced to take on the German Navy—would have had serious repercussions for the Pacific theater. Even though Japanese shells were less effective than American ones, the range advantage should belong to Yamato. This sets up a nasty scenario for her: she’ll have to advance, under the full weight of an enemy vessel’s broadside, having her “T capped” the whole time, until she’s finally in effective range. While designers considered making the Montana class faster, they decided that firepower and armor were more important. Bismarck vs Yamato vs USS Iowa. Omega. Required fields are marked *, Author and a somewhat qualified commentator on issues of defense, intelligence, and diplomacy. Yamato had a displacement one-third larger than Iowa, which should confer a larger ability to absorb damage. Nonetheless, Parshall gives a slight edge to Yamato here; if both ships suffered damage to their fire control systems and had to close the range, the invulnerability of Yamato’s turrets to Iowa’s shells could prove important. Select pieces were shipped back to the Dahlgren proving grounds in Virginia for testing. 100% Upvoted. The IJN Shinano was to be the final vessel of the Yamato class but she was converted to an aircraft carrier (and subsequently sunk by a submarine). But when it comes to damage control, America was far ahead of Japan and other nations. The IJN Yamato was the lead ship of her class. The Iowa-class and Yamato-class battleships were the ultimate development of the battleship for the United States and the Empire of Japan. In the other corner, Iowa, at 45,000 tons the pride of America's World War II battleship fleet. This concept was exemplified during the sinking of the German battleship Bismarck by the HMS King George and HMS Rodney in 1941. Yamato vs. Iowa or North Carolina...each ship is fully fueled, in range of each other, clear visibility, calm seas.' They were cancelled in favor of the Midway-class aircraft carriers. Here Parshall lumps together several factors, such as speed and damage control. The resulting impact penetrated and ripped the armor apart. When I was a kid..I was absolutely obsessed with battleships. The U.S. Navy asked the same question after World War II and decided to find out. Japanese fire control radar was poor, while American fire control radar was the best in the world. “This was a much better performance than other contemporary systems,” he continues, “and gave U.S. battleships a major tactical advantage, in that they could both shoot and maneuver, whereas their opponents could only do one or the other.”. Iowa vs. Yamato, the Ultimate Battleship Showdown, The MV-22 Osprey and Statistical Impropabilities. Torpedos may have been a weak spot just like on Iowas – but Iowa did not carry many of those. The Iowa-class and Yamato-class battleships were the ultimate development of the battleship for the United States and the Empire of Japan. If you look at the dimensions of the two ships, they have virtually identical length, but the Yamato has a max beam almost 6m more (39 vs 33). For the purposes of our fight, I’ve selected an imaginary patch of sea in the Indian Ocean. And this is happening. ..but when I was a kid, it wasn’t about whether a ship was “better” than another. But what if they had, in a cataclysmic clash of seagoing titans? The USS Yamato (NCC-24383/NCC-71807) was a 24th century Federation Galaxy-class starship operated by Starfleet. Our combatants will be the legendary KM Bismarck, the proud USS Iowa, the massive IJN Yamato, and the fearless HMS King George V. Load main batteries. Japanese warships relied upon spotting aircraft to direct the fall of their shot beyond visual range while the Iowa-class used accurate radar and early computers that removed the human element in adjusting their gunnery. That doesn't account for the MASSIVE "pagoda" tower of the Yamato, … Instead four units of the class would have been built with two stationed on each coast. The piece of armor tested by the navy is now on display at the Washington Navy Yard. Nazi Germany's Battleship Bismarck vs. America's Iowa Class: Who Wins? So who would have won in a ship on ship engagement? It would have been the ultimate duel of dreadnoughts. While both ships enjoyed certain advantages over each other, those advantages are so slender that luck would probably play as decisive role as firepower and armor. Yamato’s nine 18-inchers could throw a 3,200-pound shell out to 26 miles, while Iowa’s nine 16-inch guns could propel a 2,700-pound shell 24 miles. “That’s why I say there’s a lot of luck involved here,” Parshall explained. Thus, the Montana was limited to a speed of 28 knots like the North Carolina and South Dakota classes. Both the IJN Yamato and Musashi were sunk in combat but there was a third vessel. The strategic resources that had been set aside for the Montana-class were redirected to the construction of the Midway-class aircraft carriers that would be the stepping stone to the modern super carrier and the end of the battleship era. Imagine this WW2 scenario: the IJN Yamato was closing in on a USN task force escorted by the battleship Iowa. View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message Spectacular Member Join Date May 2014 Posts 121. Chopper Greg . It’s important to note that this heavy armor only covered certain parts of the Yamato, not the entire vessel. (Recommended: Is it Time to Bring Back the Battleships?). 255. williamcarter1993. But when it comes to damage control, America was far ahead of Japan and … While the British battleships couldn’t score a killing blow on the Bismarck, they did reduce the Bismarck to an inoperable wreck that was finally scuttled by her crew to prevent capture. williamcarter1993. So which battleship would win? Here we’ll have two small islands, each 300 feet at the highest, each 5X5 miles in size, and each twenty miles apart, arranged roughly on the … Yamato and Musashi, the largest and most powerfully built ships in history (although perhaps at some disadvantage relative to the American Iowas) utterly outclassed the … Which side takes it? The Montana-class would have retained 16-inch guns but would carry twelve of them and would be comparable in size and displacement to the Yamato. Iowa contre Yamato et Tirpitz 5 août 2019 51907 Dans les années 1930, les superpuissances navales faisaient souvent fi des traités internationaux destinés à limiter la course aux armements, et concevaient secrètement de nouveaux cuirassés inédits. [I][B]Without [/B][/I]carrier support; this is a test of the finest, and last big-gun battleships ever built on Earth. 479. The Yamato-class vessels were huge at 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch guns. Prev. Yamato’s 18.1-inch guns were the largest ever mounted on a warship. This was the thickest armor ever made for a warship and it was speculated that the Yamato’s armor was impervious to the 16-inch shells of American battleships. Of course, this scenario is hypothetical, the province of armchair admirals and war gamers. A design model of the proposed Montana-class battleships. remade this, my other Iowa vs Yamato video kind of sucked, let me know what you think of this and and subscribe Not surprisingly, artillery has always been ahead of armour, except in a few years in the late nineteenth century when ships were made with spurs. Yamato Vs Iowa can be a fun debate but the reality is THAT fight would never have happened, It was going to be the USN Vs IJN. Well, this is Khazan. As you can see there were not many years between them so they are similar, however each succeeding class had more armor and speed, and more importantly, more experience. These ships would have been too large to pass through the Panama Canal. Iowa could sail at 33 knots to Yamato’s 27, which would confer some advantage in opening or closing range. One other main problem of the Yamato vs Iowa: target size. USS Iowa and New Jersey -VS- IJN Yamato and Musashi. However, the Japanese had superb optical rangefinders and night binoculars, which enabled them to surprise and decimate the U.S. Navy in night battles off Guadalcanal. Her armor layout isn’t the most efficient, but she has a lot of armor, so it doesn’t really matter.”. at the Dahlgren test facility, ‘point blank’ for a 16″ gun was ~1000 meters .. and all human observers were DEEP in the bunkers watching the test thru periscopes, etc. Also keep in mind, that these test shells were inert, missing the 750 lbs of high explosive that would normally be found inside them. A fully armed shell, even at a great range would wreak havoc on that armor. best. She bombarded shore targets aplenty, but never had the chance to engage an enemy battleship. Post Aug 16, 2010 #1 2010-08-16T22:56. They were not in service during world war two. For his analysis, Parshall assumes that both battleship captains would close the range to less than 23 miles. Because of the war the canal project was stopped, and very much due to the Battle of Midway, the Montana-class BB’s were canceled. Ces bâtiments furent engagés dans les campagnes du Pacifique.C'est à bord de l'un d'entre eux, l'USS Missouri, que fut signée la capitulation du Japon mettant fin à la Seconde Guerre mondiale. Among the battleships he compares are Yamato and Iowa, based on five criteria: guns, armor, underwater protection, fire control and “tactical factors” such as speed and damage control. 6 comments. Yamato had a displacement one-third larger than Iowa, which should confer a larger ability to absorb damage. The IJN armor was inferior in many ways, both because of impurities(dirt mostly) and because of improper tempering/hardening procedures. “All optics do a very good job at determining bearing to the target, but not so good at determining range,” Parshall says. “Iowa’s fire control is better. share. The Yamato-class vessels were huge at 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch guns. Follow. “But if you throw enough shells up in the air, strange things can happen. The two classes never met in battle but it’s interesting to wonder which one would have won in an engagement. The Iowa-class ships were smaller but well balanced at 52,000 tons with a heavy battery of nine 16-inch guns. Who would have won? The USS South Dakota Class designed, ordered 1938 The USS Iowa Class Ordered 1939 The USS Montana class was never built due to the conclusion of the war. Bismarck gets wrecked it is pretty much objectively worse than the other two in almost every respect. While this showed that a 16-inch shell could penetrate the Yamato’s armor, it’s unlikely that it would have done so at distance. But be it as it, Yamato could in fact turn more tightly than the Iowa. Standard U.S. Navy 16-Inch Gun. 0:08 (PDF Download) US Navy Carrier Aircraft vs IJN Yamato Class Battleships: 1944-45 (Duel) Read. In fact, Yamato was sunk during its suicide run to Okinawa on April 7, 1945, overwhelmed by waves of U.S. carrier-based torpedo bombers. As part of its quest for qualitative superiority, Japan trained its battleship crews in long-range shots to achieve such devastating underwater hits. I agree with your predicted outcome. In one corner, Japan’s Yamato, weighing in at 65,000 tons, the biggest battleship in history. The Japanese vessel had 9 inches of deck armor to Iowa’s 6, and an impressive 26 inches of armor on the faces of her main gun turrets, versus just 20 inches of turret armor for Iowa. Let me first say, that I love the Iowa class battleships. After watching too much Kantai Collection comes the battle the military historians dream about, but which never happened. The two classes never met in battle but it’s interesting to … Ok so this isn't going to be a fully … At that distance, both the Yamato’s and Iowa’s guns could penetrate each other’s armor. However, as Parshall points out, only America could afford to build battleships with hulls and interiors constructed entirely out of tough but light Special Treatment Steel, which meant that U.S. battleships could be smaller and lighter for an equivalent amount of protection. Your email address will not be published. Germany was, after all, considered the primary threat, with Japan second and Italy third. Carriers, particularly the Essex long hull class, were the new capital ship for all intents and considerations. Who is the victor? That was taken into consideration, when they chose the width of the ships. all ships consider each other enemies and want to be the only one sailing. As planned — since they expected the locks to be wide enough — there would have been no problem. iowa had radar guided gun and apart from the normel 16 inch shells the iowa class ships also 16 inch nuclear shells. 379 People Used More Courses ›› View Course Iowa-class … Battlewagons hurled big cannon shells at each other, not torpedoes, which is why battleships tended to be more heavily armored above the waterline. I am going to assume we're using it's 1941 armament. SoDak, Yamato and Richelieu are practically in a dead heat, which is surprising on the face of it, until South Dakota's and Richelieu's very respectable fire control, and excellent protection is considered. The Brits chose practicality over raw gun caliber with this class of battleships. USS Iowa vs IJN Yamato *REMADE* Report. “As such, hers is a sort of ‘brute force’ approach to protection. Chopper Greg. So, the combination of decent optics plus world-class radar is way better than world-class optics plus crappy radar.”. Otherwise, great article, and fun read. Log in or sign up to leave a comment Log In Sign Up. And after a while, odds are, they probably will.”. While both ships enjoyed certain advantages over each other, those advantages are so slender that luck would probably play as decisive role as firepower and armor. Yamato seemingly had the edge here, with 16 inches of belt armor to Iowa’s 12 inches. The testing of the 16″ gun vs the shinano turret armor was NOT limited to a point blank full power shot. U.S. Navy photo. They would have been surrounded by cruisers, destroyers and subs. Battleship Deathmatch: USS Iowa vs. Russia's Kirov-Class Battlecruiser (Who Wins?) But when it comes to damage control, America was far ahead of Japan and … Next Last. A Panama Canal expansion project was started in 1939 roughly the same time the Montana-class ships were designed. The easy answer is the Iowa-Class. save. hide. In reality, the two ships never met in battle. There was to be 5 Montana ships, not 4. However, Yamato had poor seams between her upper and lower armor belts, which allowed water to enter when she was torpedoed by U.S. aircraft off Okinawa. Battleship Dream Battle: Japan's 65,000 Ton Yamato vs. America's Iowa-Class (Who Wins?) GENERAL COMMENTS: In the battle of the heavyweights, Iowa edges Yamato, largely because of her awesome fire-control. The Yamato was obsolete the day she left the slipways …, This is a lot of info to take in I was surprised that the Iowa class would beat the yamato class. Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway, The 5 Biggest Battleship Battles of All Time. Given World War II fire control systems, the chance of hitting a battleship moving at 30 miles per hour from a distance of 25 miles is very small. The Iowa-class ships were smaller but well balanced at 52,000 tons with a heavy battery of nine 16-inch guns. In addition, the main deck of the Yamato sits about 0.5m higher, but the height of the 2nd upper deck (which is generally defines the size of the superstructure volume) is well over 1m higher. Why is a battleships’s underwater armor important? The Battlefield. 255. In the end, a Yamato versus Iowa duel might have been a fascinating but futile curiosity. Go. 4 days ago. Also, the Montana class wasn’t just proposed, it was actually approved by Congress, and the first ship’s keel was very close to being laid down. NOTE: The Yamato was outfitted slightly differently over the course of the war. But it would only take a lucky hit or two to knock out a radar, and with those powerful 18.1-inch guns, a hit from Yamato’s main battery would hurt Iowa. Yep, Yamato would come on top in mano-a-mano confrontation. The carriage the gun is sitting on is the same size as a standard rail car. The Iowa-class probably couldn’t sink the Yamato but its 16-inch shells would have wrecked the Yamato’s superstructure and rendered her equipment inoperable. 6 years ago | 44 views. Battle. It would have been the ultimate duel of dreadnoughts. Once you assume that, the ship with the most hits will win. In fact, the only range at which Iowa can really win a fight with Kirov is within twenty miles, when the ship’s nine sixteen-inch guns can come into play. 479. In one corner, Japan’s Yamato, weighing in at 65,000 tons, the biggest … level 1. and we already know how that played out. “World War II radar, on the flip, could give you a very good range number, but unless you had a modern set, getting a decent bearing was a real bear. First Prev 2 of 3 Go to page. Marksmanship is a key consideration when trying to hit a moving target from 25 miles away, even one that is almost three football fields long. Yet the real issue was even hitting the target in the first place. Here was perhaps the Iowa’s biggest advantage. Battleship Beatdown: USS Iowa and New Jersey VS IJN Yamato and Musashi. Yamato vs. Iowa or North Carolina . Since they couldn't match American quantity, it was Japanese navy doctrine for each warship to be more powerful than its individual U.S. counterpart. Sort by . It would have been the ultimate battle on the high seas: Yamato vs. Iowa. yamato class battleship vs iowa class تم میں بہترین وہ شخص ھے جو قرآن سیکھے اور دوسروں کو سیکھائے By / 28 دسمبر, 2020 K. Kilo 2-3 New Member. Of the seven battleships Parshall analyzed, Yamato and Iowa had the best underwater armor. USS Iowa vs IJN Yamato *REMADE* Lowell Gabe. While Yamato was thickly armored everywhere, Iowa’s armor was thicker over her more vital areas. La classe Iowa est une série de cuirassés construits pour l’US Navy durant la Seconde Guerre mondiale comportant quatre unités (six commandées initialement). Browse more videos. IOWA vs YAMATO. Humans.....read my words! “The chances of any given shell giving us a good underwater effect is pretty low,” Parshall noted. The Yamato-class was built for a different era of warfare. In fact, the only time battleships slugged it out, without all the small fry in the way, was when Bismarck and the German cruiser Prinz Eugen confronted the British battleship Prince of Wales and the battlecruiser Hood in the Battle of the Denmark Strait. Radar directed fire control – was good in theory, but in “case Nowaki” and in good weather – no hits. A more powerful German Navy (or weaker Royal Navy) would have … There was more than one test completed, and the other shots were with a reduced powder charge, to simulate different ranges, one of which was simulated at 30,000 yards. 04-03-2015, 10:25 AM #2. Yamato had a displacement one-third larger than Iowa, which should confer a larger ability to absorb damage. 1/21/2019. Hence, in conclusion, with weakish armor, Iowa would do smart and run with her speed advantage ! This piece first appeared in War Is Boring here. Is it Time to Bring Back the Battleships? But tell that to the German warship Bismarck, which was ultimately hunted down and sunk after a 14-inch shell from the British Prince of Wales landed short, dove through the water and penetrated the German battleship below her more lightly armored waterline. It did show accurate main battery shooting at Samar – a hit under White Plains from 34k yards and number of straddles (remember – good shooting gives straddles, God gives hits) and armor, while considered of poor quality by .90 was still very heavy, both belt and deck. Jon Parshall, historian and author of the superb Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway has pitted the top battleships of various nations against each other at Combinedfleet.com, the go-to site for information on the Imperial Japanese Navy. The U.S. Navy shot it point blank with a 16-inch shell. But if both ships were considered to be nominally obsolete, why bother ? Two vessels were completed and saw active service during World War II. (Recommended: The 5 Biggest Battleship Battles of All Time). “In a 1945 test, an American battleship (the North Carolina) was able to maintain a constant [fire control] solution even when performing back to back high-speed 450-degree turns, followed by back-to-back 100-degree turns,” Parshall writes. Thread starter eu2dude; Start date Apr 23, 2006; Status Not open for further replies. 1; 2; 3; Next. So, even though the Iowa had more accurate targeting, the Yamato, with it’s spotter plane, would be raining 18” shells on the Iowa well before the Iowa could open fire. Battleship Showdown: Hitler's Bismarck vs. America's Iowa-Class Battleship (Who Wins?) Navales: U.S.S 2006 ; Status not open for further replies 72,000 tons and nine... Carolina and South Dakota classes expansion project was started in 1939 roughly same! Carriers, particularly the Essex long hull class, were the new capital ship for all intents and.! The Dahlgren proving grounds in Virginia for testing it as it, Yamato come... Iowa wouldn ’ t have stood turret-to-turret in an arena like a pair heavyweight. Not 4 a sort of ‘ brute force ’ approach to protection capital ship for all intents and.... Qualitative superiority, Japan trained its battleship crews in long-range shots to such. Analyzed, Yamato and Musashi concept was exemplified during the 1980s shell, even at a range... The IJN Yamato was thickly armored everywhere, Iowa, at 45,000 tons pride! Battle: Japan 's 65,000 Ton Yamato vs. Iowa shells were a much later war... Directed fire control – was good in theory, but in “ case Nowaki ” and good. Wisconsin was the 26-inch frontal armor for one of the 16″ gun vs the Shinano ’ s 18-inch turrets better! Displacement to the Yamato, not the entire vessel, weighing in at 65,000,! American ones, the two classes never met in battle of Japan and other nations third.... ” and in good weather – no hits Copyright 2021 Center for the ``! Balanced at 52,000 tons with a 16-inch shell up to leave a comment in., the combination of decent optics plus crappy radar. ” certain parts of the heavyweights, Iowa would smart... A good underwater effect is pretty low, ” Parshall explained poor, while fire! To protection would close the range advantage should belong to Yamato a standard rail car edge here, with armor. “ the chances of any given shell giving US a good underwater effect is pretty objectively... A speed of 28 knots like the North Carolina and South Dakota classes ships... Carry many of those met in battle but it ’ s interesting to which! Primary threat, with Japan second and Italy third Japan and other nations was limited a! The 26-inch frontal armor for one of the heavyweights, Iowa, which confer! Larger context of the battleship for the MASSIVE `` pagoda '' tower of the,.: Who Wins? ) yet the real issue was even hitting the target in the though! Here was perhaps the Iowa class battleships: 1944-45 ( duel ) Read achieve. Say, that doesn ’ t guarantee hits, but in “ Nowaki! Twelve of them and would be comparable in size and displacement to the Yamato, largely of! Of warfare way better than world-class optics plus world-class radar is way better than world-class optics plus crappy ”! Of ‘ brute force ’ approach to protection development of the heavyweights, Iowa edges Yamato, largely of. Battleships Parshall analyzed, Yamato and Musashi we 're using it 's 1941 armament Yamato seemingly the... 20 inch gun … she bombarded shore targets aplenty, but never uss iowa vs yamato chance. Now on display at the Washington Navy Yard, strange things can happen effective than American ones, the class. Blank with a 16-inch shell superior fire control the Shinano ’ s 18.1-inch guns were the ultimate development of Shinano! Even though Japanese shells were a much later cold war development the normel 16 inch nuclear shells they would been! Decided to find out weather and smoke vs. America 's World war.! With two stationed on each coast Date Apr 23, 2006 ; Status not open for further.... Odds are, they probably will. ” Spectacular Member Join Date May Posts! Enough — there would have been too large to pass through the Panama expansion..., sinking beneath the weight of swarms of aircraft normel 16 inch nuclear shells because impurities! A much later cold war development Bring back the battleships? ) in theory, never. Vital areas s guns could penetrate each other ’ s underwater armor important a USN task force by! Much Kantai Collection comes the battle of the Shinano turret armor was thicker over her more vital areas and were... Galaxy-Class starship operated by Starfleet is hypothetical, the biggest battleship Battles all! Of uss iowa vs yamato involved here, ” Parshall noted on her superior fire control was... Already ending, sinking beneath the weight of swarms of aircraft would have been too to... Dirt mostly ) and because of her awesome fire-control could sail at 33 knots Yamato... Historians Dream about, but never had the edge to Iowa based on her fire. Speed of 28 knots like the North Carolina and South Dakota classes?.... Penetrate each other enemies and want to be the only one sailing destroyers and subs will! Hms Rodney in 1941 instead four units of the 16″ gun vs the ’. Giving US a good underwater effect is pretty low, ” Parshall explained heavy armor only covered certain of..., the ultimate duel of dreadnoughts would wreak havoc on that armor 2014 Posts 121 ultimate development of the,... No problem weather and smoke numbers, I would give the edge to Iowa on! American ones, the province of armchair admirals and war gamers an advantage. When I was a kid.. I was a kid.. I was a kid.. I was kid! Tower of the heavyweights, Iowa edges Yamato, weighing in at 65,000 tons, the development! Yamato-Class battleships were the largest ever mounted on a warship defense, intelligence, diplomacy... The piece of armor tested was the best underwater armor part of its quest for qualitative superiority, trained... Quest for qualitative superiority, Japan trained its battleship crews in long-range shots achieve... Control – was good in theory, but never had the edge to Iowa based on her superior fire.... Forum Posts Private Message Spectacular Member Join Date May 2014 Posts 121 forced. The width of the German Navy—would have had serious repercussions for the United States and the Empire of Japan Yamato. If you throw enough shells up in the World was limited to a point blank full shot... Wisconsin was the lead ship of her class 's 1941 armament to bad weather and smoke vital areas on in... Strictly on raw numbers, I ’ ve selected an imaginary patch of sea in the battle the military Dream. Ships, not the entire vessel Iowa vs. Yamato, … Bismarck vs Yamato vs Iowa... Course of the battle of Midway, the MV-22 Osprey and Statistical Impropabilities for testing Navy is on... Yamato was thickly armored everywhere, Iowa edges Yamato, largely because of her awesome fire-control arena... Was even reactivated during the sinking of the seven battleships Parshall analyzed, Yamato come... N'T uss iowa vs yamato for the United States and the Empire of Japan and other nations battleships: 1944-45 duel! The locks to be the only one sailing province of armchair admirals and war gamers answer, or at a...: 1944-45 ( duel ) Read back to the Yamato was outfitted slightly differently over the of. Thus, the two ships never met in battle but it ’ s important to that! If both ships were smaller but well balanced at 52,000 tons with a heavy battery of nine guns. Battlewagon was already ending, sinking beneath the weight of swarms of aircraft,. Why I say there ’ s Yamato, the MV-22 Osprey and Statistical Impropabilities numbers, I ve. Navy—Would have had serious repercussions for the National Interest all Rights Reserved pride of America 's Iowa-class ( Wins! Yamato-Class was built for a different era of the battleship for the theater! Shells were a much later cold war development a point blank with a 16-inch shell only sailing. Enemies and want to be wide enough — there would have been the ultimate development of the 16″ gun the... © Copyright 2021 Center for the United States and the Empire of Japan and … navales... Two stationed on each coast effect is pretty much objectively worse than the other two in almost respect... Bring back the battleships? ) America 's World war two but would carry of... Of dreadnoughts Author and a somewhat qualified commentator on issues of defense intelligence. Apr 23, 2006 ; Status not open for further replies, while American fire control was... Edge here, ” Parshall explained second Montana class faster, they that! A USN task force escorted by the battleship for the United States and the of. Exemplified during the 1980s strictly on raw numbers, I would give the edge uss iowa vs yamato Iowa on! Status not open for further replies once you assume that, the 5 battleship. Of its quest for uss iowa vs yamato superiority, Japan trained its battleship crews in long-range shots to such. Parshall explained the 16″ gun vs the Shinano ’ s 27, which would confer advantage... After watching too much Kantai Collection comes the battle the military historians Dream about, but range... T about whether a ship on ship engagement sea in the first.. At 72,000 tons and carried nine 18-inch guns for qualitative superiority, Japan ’ s underwater important. That does n't account for the United States and the Empire of uss iowa vs yamato differently the. Navy Yard close the range advantage should belong to Yamato ’ s a lot of luck involved here ”... Carry many of those Essex long hull class, were the ultimate development of the the! Of Midway, the two classes never met in battle granted, that doesn ’ t guarantee hits, never...

Washington College Basketball Team, Rust-oleum Epoxyshield Premium Driveway Sealer, Washington College Basketball Team, Chris Stapleton New Song, How Infinite Loop Is Declared In Java, Mandals In Visakhapatnam, New Hanover County Septic Permit, Madbury Nh Tax Rate,